dhcpd 3.0.1 stops responding to requests

[Wil Birkmaier]

Thanks, I actually did switch over the day before and had the same
problem.  That's the point were I switched off peer failover services
and went stand alone.  

Its been about 12 hours now with no problems, so the next 12 should tell
me something!

Thanks!

Wil

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org] On
Behalf Of Glenn Satchell
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:03 AM
To: dhcp-users at isc.org
Subject: RE: dhcpd 3.0.1 stops responding to requests

Hi Wil,

3.0.1 is pretty old, you should try upgrading to the latest release,
3.0.4 and see if the problem persists. There have been a *lot* of
bugfixes, especially to do with failover since 3.0.1 was released.

regards,
-glenn

>Subject: RE: dhcpd 3.0.1 stops responding to requests
>Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 17:11:24 -0700
>From: "Wil Birkmaier" <wil at bea.com>
>To: <dhcp-users at isc.org>
>
>Thanks Chuck, I will give that a try.
>
>On another note, I turned off ddns intermit setting as well as put it
in
>stand alone mode.  It has been running for around 10 hours, so I shall
>see how that goes as well.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Wil
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org] On
>Behalf Of Chuck Anderson
>Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 5:24 PM
>To: dhcp-users at isc.org
>Subject: Re: dhcpd 3.0.1 stops responding to requests
>
>On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:00:13AM -0700, Wil Birkmaier wrote:
>> Hello All, I have tried searching thru the archives as well as google
>> the last couple days and have come to my wits end trying to figure
>this
>> one out.  The only thought I have at this point is the failover has
>> problems with using other ports (Using 521 instead of 520) or WANs
>
>I don't think so.  I run multiple instances of failover on the same 
>dhcpd, each one using a different port starting at 520 and going up to 
>523.  I also set the peer port to the same port number.
>
>>         mclt 600;
>>         split 255;
>>         load balance max seconds 3;
>> }
>
>I think I read on here once that the split 255 may cause an issue.  
>I've always used the default split of 128.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
>information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
>entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
>legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
individual
>or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
>and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
>by email and then delete it.
>


_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.