Forwarding zone, setup

Gregory Sloop gregs at sloop.net
Tue Mar 1 18:53:19 UTC 2022


>Are you loading the parent domain and trying to zone forward a child domain on the same DNS server? I.e. loading somedomain.local and trying to forward ab.somedomain.local
 
Yup, exactly.
 
That solution was suggested by Jeff Sumner yesterday, but it seemed a little nuts to me (BIND behaving that way) - though your explanation makes that behavior seem less crazy.
If I get a chance, I'll perhaps try that, just to see if it fixes it - though someone at ISC might save me the work, confirming the behavior. (please do!)
 
And, if that's the case, then static-sub is the far superior option - since it's much more simple and straight-forward.
 
Consider it solved. 
If ISC can confirm that behavior for forwarding a child domain when the server is also auth for the parent zone, that would be very nice!
 
Thanks to everyone, again, for the help!
 
    

> Are you loading the parent domain and trying to zone forward a child domain on the same DNS server? I.e. loading somedomain.local and trying to forward ab.somedomain.local

> If so an NS delegation is required in every instance I have done in my environment. The NS doesn't need to be "right" but it needs to exist. I don't know the internal BIND logic for that but I have always taken it as "I load the parent and I know the child doesn't exist because there isn't a delegation to make it exist so why would I forward something that doesn't exist".


> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 1:18 PM Gregory Sloop <gregs at sloop.net> wrote:

>> Static-sub fixes the issue.
>>  
>> Any idea why static-sub works when forwarder doesn't?
>>  
>> (Again, the server is using recursion. Dig queries return the RA flag, so I know it's actually offering recursion in reality.)
>>  
>> I can live with static-sub just fine, since it works - but I'd really love to understand why forwarder didn't - just so I can avoid getting bitten by it in some other situation.
>>  
>> Thanks Andrej!
>> -Greg
>>   

>>> Is static-stub something you are looking for?

>>> Reference documentation:
>>> https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9_18_0/reference.html?highlight=static-stub#zone-types

>>> And in human terms:
>>> https://jpmens.net/2011/01/25/binds-new-static-stub-zone-type/

>>> Ondrej
>>> --
>>> Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
>>> ondrej at isc.org

>>> My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.

>>>> On 28. 2. 2022, at 21:47, Gregory Sloop <gregs at sloop.net> wrote:

>>>> So, I want to forward all queries for 
>>>> *.ab.somedomain.local to some other internal DNS servers.
>>>> (Records in *.ab.somedomain.local actually are our active domain servers)
>>>>  
>>>> (Yes, I know .local is reserved now, but we've been using it a long time and changing would be rather painful. Unless there's some horrible consequences, I think we'll just continue for now. We won't ever use mDNS.)
>>>>  
>>>> zone "ab.somedomain.local" {
>>>> type forward;
>>>> forward only;
>>>> forwarders { 10.0.0.1; 10.0.0.2; 10.0.0.3; };
>>>> };

>>>> But this doesn't appear to do what I want.
>>>>  
>>>> If I add the above to my regular BIND servers configuration, it doesn't return results like it's forwarding them. (I get NXDOMAIN for abc.ab.somedomain.local.)
>>>>  
>>>> If I do a dig @10.0.0.1 abc.ab.somedomain.local from the BIND server, I get a proper result. (force dig to use the AD name servers directly, instead of relying on the forward.)
>>>>  
>>>> (And yes the resolv.conf file has the ip addresses of the main internal BIND servers in it, and those only.)
>>>> I've looked and while I think I'm doing it right, I'm not entirely sure.
>>>> I figured before I beat my head against the wall for too long, I'd ask the real experts! :)
>>>>  

-- 
Gregory Sloop, Principal: Sloop Network & Computer Consulting
Voice: 503.251.0452 x121
EMail: gregs at sloop.net
http://www.sloop.net
---
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20220301/17da8f3e/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the bind-users mailing list