Why named bind(2)s 0.0.0.0 and :: adresses?
Adam Tkac
atkac at redhat.com
Mon Oct 29 13:42:32 UTC 2007
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:21:50AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> FAQ.
>
Thanks, I missed "address" parameter of query-source* option.
Adam
> > Hi all,
> >
> > has anyone here explanation why named bind(2)s addresses 0.0.0.0 and
> > :: ? I have this in options statement:
> >
> > options {
> > ...
> > listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; };
> > listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; };
> > ...
> > };
> >
> > but netstat says named listen also on
> > udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:32779 0.0.0.0:* 6898/named
> > udp 0 0 :::32780 :::* 6898/named
> >
> > I'm interested why named listen on that ports.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > --
> > Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
> >
> >
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at isc.org
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list