Why named bind(2)s 0.0.0.0 and :: adresses?
Mark Andrews
Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Mon Oct 29 13:21:50 UTC 2007
FAQ.
> Hi all,
>
> has anyone here explanation why named bind(2)s addresses 0.0.0.0 and
> :: ? I have this in options statement:
>
> options {
> ...
> listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; };
> listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; };
> ...
> };
>
> but netstat says named listen also on
> udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:32779 0.0.0.0:* 6898/named
> udp 0 0 :::32780 :::* 6898/named
>
> I'm interested why named listen on that ports.
>
> Adam
>
> --
> Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
>
>
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at isc.org
More information about the bind-users
mailing list