resolving a second zone!

Barry Margolin barmar at alum.mit.edu
Thu Mar 18 16:28:48 UTC 2004


In article <c3cdng$2qb4$1 at sf1.isc.org>,
 Barry Finkel <b19141 at achilles.ctd.anl.gov> wrote:

> "aperry" <aperry at terayon.com> wrote:
> 
> I have an internal dns server that provides lookups for my domain, so lets
> >say "alan.com", now we are adding another zone for active directory, lets
> >say "ads.alan.com". The dns server for "alan.com" will only serv dns for
> >that domain, for lookups in "ads.alan.com" I want to tell my dns to go to a
> >name server on the "ads.alan.com" domain. I am not sure how to set this up.
> >In my named.conf file, what type of server would i be to that domain? I am
> >guessing that i will just need to set up a a db file with the SOA being in
> >the ads.alan.com domain, but would like to clarify that. Also if i need to
> >do a password lookup on a pdc in the ads.alan.com network for samba
> >purposes, how would i set up my resolver to do this? would the rosolver on
> >my unix boxes look like this:
> >
> >domain alan.com
> >search alan.com, ads.alan.com
> >nameserver 192.168.1.1
> 
> Others have told you how to add the delegation records in the alan.com
> zone.  Have you also considered adding the ads.alan.com zone as a 
> slave zone on your BIND servers?  If your clients are already set up
> to query your BIND servers, then those clients will not have to change
> their TCP/IP configuration to add one of the ads name servers

Active Directory zones change very frequently in many environments, so 
it's easy for slave zones to be out of date much of the time.  If you 
want better reliability, it's probably better to recurse to the real AD 
servers rather than slaving.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***


More information about the bind-users mailing list