DNS n LDAP
John Steele
steele at dfw.nostrum.com
Sat Feb 26 18:37:47 UTC 2000
You might want to look at
http://www.process.com/ipaddressworks/ipaddressworks.htm
Last time we contacted them @ work (several months ago), they only
had an NT version, but the Solaris version was in-work, so it might be
available now.
--John
Michael Cunningham Wrote:
>Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 23:50:55 -0500
>From: Michael Cunningham <malice at exit109.com>
>To: Alvarez Angel Javier <angel.alvarez at uah.es>
>cc: bind-users at isc.org
>Subject: Re: DNS n LDAP
>
>> Perhaps we just can integrate bind with ldap ( In order to feed a bunch of
>> dns's (Winnt and bind) so all of them are master for the same zone and ldap
>> acts as a storage and resorce manager for all of them)
>
>Why have them all be masters for the same zone? Why not one master and
>the rest secondaries?
>
>> I´m searching for information about ldap and dns but i cant find anything.
>
>I am not aware of anyone using ldap and bind together but I suppose
>its possible but definatly not ideal. You can ask around on
>www.openldap.org for more info. There is a mailing list there.
>
>Mike
>
>
>
--
______John F. Steele___________________________________________
(___________________________________steele at dfw.nostrum.com______)
Gibb's Law:
Infinity is one lawyer waiting for another.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list