Getting failover: link startup timeout

[Kraishak Mahtha]

Hi Bob, Sorry I didn't get you, The ports are not duplicated in the second
case

Case 1)Failover-peer1 (Server A and Server B)--port 647
      and Failover-peer-2(Server B and Server A) --> port 648

Case 2) Failover-peer1 (ServerA --primary port 647 and Server
B--failover-port 648)
    and Failover-peer-2(Server B --primary port 649 and Server A-->failover
port 650)

In the second case, we don't have duplicate ports, and to your earlier
statement

I tried both cases and both have issues

First, your config isn't correct. You have both the primary and secondary
configured with the same IP address

---> Is using the same server as primary and failover a wrong thing in ISC?

Thanks


On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 6:27 PM Bob McDonald <bmcdonaldjr at gmail.com> wrote:

> Upon re-reading my post, I have responded incorrectly. Instead of
> duplicating the IP address of the two servers, I meant to point out that
> the port was duplicated.
>
> Mea culpa,
>
> Bob
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20230703/bef31e5d/attachment.htm>