Aw: Re: Re: ISC dhcp assigns ip addresses outside dynamic range
perl-list
perl-list at network1.net
Thu Jul 5 21:33:48 UTC 2018
This line:
Jul 5 13:14:35 a-rl-dhcp1 dhcpd[20145]: bind update on 10.91.120.80 from dhcp-failover rejected: unknown IP address
Makes it seem like it was handed out dynamically. Static assignments with fixed-address are not written to a lease file. They are also not sent to the peer.
I'm not sure what is going on here.
> From: "Frank Ulherr" <dhcp at ulherr.eu>
> To: ck at cksoft.de, "Users of ISC DHCP" <dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 8:10:22 AM
> Subject: Aw: Re: Re: ISC dhcp assigns ip addresses outside dynamic range
> Hi!
> * "Christian Kratzer" <ck-lists at cksoft.de> wrote:
>> oh now there is also redunancy involved so you have two config files and two
> > lease files.
> > If you want help please do as asked previously
> > 1. post logs of the transaction
> > 2. post both configs that were effective at time of the transaction
>> 3. check both lease files for the ip and the mac at the time of the transaction
> > for entries with the mac or the ip
> > The more you obfuscate the less anybody can help you.
> Attached the config and log files.
> 10.91.120.80 is reserved and is excludes from the dynamic range.
> dhcpd.conf is the same on the first and second server (dhcpd1.conf)
> The dhcpd.leases file an the second server does not contain the lease.
> Regards,
> Frank
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20180705/dc07e58e/attachment.html>
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list