Option 82 logging on dhcpd 4.1.1 and red hat 6

project722 project722 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 5 16:18:26 UTC 2016


It does not seem to like anything I try. My latest attempt:

suffix (concat("CIRCUIT-ID=", ( option agent.circuit-id), "."))));

It keeps complaining "comma expected" blah blah

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:01 AM, project722 <project722 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Do you mean something like this:
>
> suffix (concat("CIRCUIT-ID=", substring ( option agent.circuit-id, 0,
> 9999,)
>
> Because this is not working either.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:41 AM, project722 <project722 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When I put that in as you have it listed I get errors when validating the
>> config.
>>
>> /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf line 190: expecting data expression.
>>
>> How does the actual statement need to look?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Ilkka Virta <itvirta at iki.fi> wrote:
>>
>>> If you want the whole of circuit-id printed, instead of a part, just use
>>> concat(... "CIRCUIT-ID=", option agent.circuit-id, ...) instead of calling
>>> substring(). substring(x, 2, 9999) takes the 9999 characters (bytes) after
>>> the first two, which you'd want to use if you know you don't have anything
>>> interesting in the first two bytes.
>>>
>>> On 5.10. 17:43, project722 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok. Making progress. I have went with the following log statements in my
>>>> conf file:
>>>>
>>>
>>>         " | CIRCUIT-ID=",
>>>>         substring( option agent.circuit-id, 2, 9999),
>>>> Which produces log output as follows:
>>>>
>>>
>>> | CIRCUIT-ID=0R_LAB eth 1/2/1/1/1:200 | REMOTE-ID=tion82Test__DATA_ETH1
>>>>
>>>> My question is:
>>>>
>>>> Are my substrings at the bottom for pulling in text correct? It appears
>>>> as if the first part of the strings are cut off. What are my "values" I
>>>> can use in these statements instead of 2, 9999? What should I change
>>>> here to get the full text output without cutting off text?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 8:04 AM, project722 <project722 at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:project722 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     I have adjusted my statement to account for the binary to ACSII
>>>>     conversion. I'll test and report back if I run into any problems.
>>>>
>>>>     On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Glenn Satchell
>>>>     <glenn.satchell at uniq.com.au <mailto:glenn.satchell at uniq.com.au>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         There may be non-ascii characters in your option
>>>>         agent.circuit-id, so try
>>>>         a suitable binary-to-ascii() around it. If there is a non-ascii
>>>>         or null it
>>>>         won't print anything.
>>>>
>>>>         The parenthesis around a variable make no difference, they just
>>>>         control
>>>>         order of parameters.
>>>>
>>>>         regards,
>>>>         -glenn
>>>>
>>>>         On Wed, October 5, 2016 3:49 am, project722 wrote:
>>>>         > Hmmm.. OK here is the log for the test client.
>>>>         >
>>>>         > Oct  4 11:39:20 dhcpd: Lease for X.X.X.X with circuit-id
>>>>         >
>>>>         > That's all it said.
>>>>         >
>>>>         > I know that my ACL class for circuit id works as it was
>>>> allowed to get an
>>>>         > IP address.
>>>>         >
>>>>         > The log line reported back the correct IP so I know that the
>>>>         >
>>>>         > "Lease for ", binary-to-ascii (10, 8, ".", leased-address),
>>>>         >
>>>>         > Line in my logging clause works.
>>>>         >
>>>>         > But why did it stop there? Do I need to remove the parenthesis
>>>>         around
>>>>         > "option agent.circuit-id" since I am not using parenthesis in
>>>>         my ACL
>>>>         > class?
>>>>         >
>>>>         > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:25 AM, project722
>>>>         <project722 at gmail.com <mailto:project722 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>         >
>>>>         >> Alfred - thanks but your setup is much more complex than
>>>> mine.
>>>>         >>
>>>>         >> Alex, I have put in the changes as you suggested and it
>>>> passed
>>>>         >> validation.
>>>>         >> I'll report back what the logs look like or if I have any
>>>> further
>>>>         >> problems.
>>>>         >>
>>>>         >> Thanks!
>>>>         >>
>>>>         >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Alex Moen <alexm at ndtel.com
>>>>         <mailto:alexm at ndtel.com>> wrote:
>>>>         >>
>>>>         >>> Just comparing with mine, it seems that the "option
>>>>         agent.circuit-id"
>>>>         >>> needs to be in parens.  And, I don't know the use of the
>>>>         >>> "(leased-address)"
>>>>         >>> is.  So, try this:
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>         >>> ## Option 82 Class
>>>>         >>> class "myvendor" {
>>>>         >>> match if option agent.circuit-id = 00:04:00:6b:00:84;
>>>>         >>> }
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> # Test Option 82 logging
>>>>         >>> if exists agent.circuit-id
>>>>         >>> {
>>>>         >>> log (info, concat(
>>>>         >>>     "Lease for ", binary-to-ascii (10, 8, ".",
>>>> leased-address),
>>>>         >>>     " with circuit-id ", (option agent.circuit-id),
>>>>         >>>     " is assigned using Option82"
>>>>         >>>     ));
>>>>         >>> }
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> pool {
>>>>         >>>                 allow members of "myvendor";
>>>>         >>>                 range x.x.x.x x.x.x.x;
>>>>         >>>         }
>>>>         >>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> This should give you a line that looks something like:
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> Lease for 192.168.0.10 with circuit-id Ethernet 5 is
>>>>         assigned using
>>>>         >>> Option82
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> Obviously, your circuit-id will most likely be something
>>>>         other than
>>>>         >>> "Ethernet 5", but you get the idea.
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> If I'm way off base, someone please correct me!
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> Good luck,
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> Alex
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> On 10/04/2016 10:27 AM, project722 wrote:
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>>> Hello DHCP experts! We are implementing Option 82 in our
>>>>         network and I
>>>>         >>>> am just scratching the surface of how to setup my server. I
>>>>         have
>>>>         >>>> successfully created my first Option 82 ACL based on the
>>>>         agent circuit
>>>>         >>>> ID
>>>>         >>>> that is contained in the packet, now I just need guidance
>>>>         on how I get
>>>>         >>>> the
>>>>         >>>> Option 82 data into the logs. Here is my O82 setup on the
>>>>         server:
>>>>         >>>>
>>>>         >>>> ## Option 82 Class
>>>>         >>>> class "myvendor" {
>>>>         >>>> match if option agent.circuit-id = 00:04:00:6b:00:84;
>>>>         >>>> }
>>>>         >>>>
>>>>         >>>> # Test Option 82 logging
>>>>         >>>> if exists agent.circuit-id
>>>>         >>>> {
>>>>         >>>> log (info, concat( "Lease for ", option agent.circuit-id
>>>>         >>>> (leased-address), "is an address assigned using
>>>> Option82"));
>>>>         >>>> }
>>>>         >>>>
>>>>         >>>> pool {
>>>>         >>>>                 allow members of "myvendor";
>>>>         >>>>                 range x.x.x.x x.x.x.x;
>>>>         >>>>         }
>>>>         >>>>
>>>>         >>>> The problem I am having is when I go to check the conf
>>>> before
>>>>         >>>> restarting
>>>>         >>>> dhcpd I am getting the error:
>>>>         >>>>
>>>>         >>>> etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf line 135: right parenthesis expected.
>>>>         >>>> log (info, concat( "Lease for ", option agent.circuit-id (
>>>>         >>>> ^
>>>>         >>>> Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong and how to fix
>>>>         this error?
>>>>         >>>>
>>>>         >>>>
>>>>         >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>         >>>> dhcp-users mailing list
>>>>         >>>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org <mailto:dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>
>>>>         >>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>>>         <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users>
>>>>         >>>>
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> --
>>>>         >>> Alex Moen
>>>>         >>> NSTII
>>>>         >>> Calix System Specialist
>>>>         >>> North Dakota Telephone Company
>>>>         >>> 701-662-6481 <tel:701-662-6481>
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>> _______________________________________________
>>>>         >>> dhcp-users mailing list
>>>>         >>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org <mailto:dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>
>>>>         >>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>>>         <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users>
>>>>         >>>
>>>>         >>
>>>>         >>
>>>>         > _______________________________________________
>>>>         > dhcp-users mailing list
>>>>         > dhcp-users at lists.isc.org <mailto:dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>
>>>>         > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>>>         <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         dhcp-users mailing list
>>>>         dhcp-users at lists.isc.org <mailto:dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>
>>>>         https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>>>         <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dhcp-users mailing list
>>>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
>>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dhcp-users mailing list
>>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20161005/97687fbe/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the dhcp-users mailing list