Failover static and dynamic lease

[Patrick Trapp]

What sort of redundancy do you seek? Do you want the second system to automatically provide addresses if the first system fails? Or are you OK with manually starting the replacement server?

Also, having an identical copy of the dhcpd.conf is one thing, but it doesn't hold your lease information, of course.

I would suggest failover if you really want redundancy, but I won't be much help configuring it as I inherited mine and have made almost no changes to it.

Patrick
________________________________________
From: dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org [dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] on behalf of Marcos Renato da Silva Junior [marcosjr at dee.feis.unesp.br]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 1:56 PM
To: dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
Subject: Failover static and dynamic lease

Hi,

I have a server with static lease (some hosts) and dynamic lease (range
192.168.0.100 192.168.0.110;).

I want to add a second server for redundancy. Whats the better way?
Configure failover? or just keep identical copies from the dhcpd.conf
filein both servers?

Thanks.

--
Marcos Renato da Silva Junior
Universidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp
Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira - FEIS
Departamento de Engenharia Elétrica
15385-000 - Ilha Solteira/SP
(18) 3743-1164

_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users