Option 82 based static allocations mixed with dynamic allocations

[Eugene Grosbein]

08.06.2016 3:44, Jason Lixfeld wrote:

> My hope is that the solution can be much simpler and more elegant
>  than having to add a 'ignore (or deny) members of CustomerOnPortX/X’
>  for each of those customer classes to the pool that allows members of “rgw01.lab”.

I've tried to solve exacly this problem myself some time ago and found there is no another way.