Why would addresses from a range not appear in the lease file

Sat Apr 23 11:03:44 UTC 2016

On 23 Apr 2016, at 11:44, Niall O'Reilly wrote:

> On 22 Apr 2016, at 21:55, Friesen, Don MTIC:EX wrote:
>
>>    We included a new range in a secondary subnet, and only half the 
>> addresses appeared in the dhcpd.leases file.
>
>   Could it be that the leases which haven't shown up in dhcpd.leases 
> simply
>   haven't been assigned yet?

   I'm sorry.  I misread the question.  With failover mode, I too would 
find what you describe surprising.
   Best regards,
   Niall O'Reilly