Log messages

[Keith]

We recently started using Option 82 on our dslams.

I first turned it on for a few of them the first week of Jan.

Using this in the subnet declaration:

if exists agent.circuit-id {
        log ( error, concat( "Lease for ", binary-to-ascii (10, 8, ".",
leased-address), " is connected to ", option agent.circuit-id)); 
        }

will generate this line in Dhcpd.log:

Lease for 69.176.181.162 is connected to
Shelf-14-30:1/1:0.35:VLAN=1:ifIndex=1003001

Something I did not notice for some reason until today is a log line that is
appearing:

dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive: there is no lease
associated with this client

I can't tell where its coming from.

DHCPDISCOVER from 00:16:b6:80:b5:13 (tc-e4f6ed2f5b87) via 69.176.179.1
Jan 21 09:18:20 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 69.176.179.166 to 00:16:b6:80:b5:13
via 69.176.179.1
Jan 21 09:18:20 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 69.176.179.166 (209.145.111.37)
from 00:16:b6:80:b5:13 via 69.176.179.1
Jan 21 09:18:20 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPACK on 69.176.179.166 to 00:16:b6:80:b5:13
via 69.176.179.1
Jan 21 09:18:33 netreg1 dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive:
there is no lease associated with this client.
Jan 21 09:18:33 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 69.176.180.150 via 69.176.180.1
Jan 21 09:18:33 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPACK to 69.176.180.150 (e0:69:95:77:5c:98) via
bce0
Jan 21 09:18:42 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 44:6d:57:56:3f:4f (Gerry-HP)
via 69.176.178.1
Jan 21 09:18:43 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 69.176.178.90 to 44:6d:57:56:3f:4f
(Gerry-HP) via 69.176.178.1

A little snip of the log file, is this being generated from the 69.176.180.150
lease or the 69.176.179.166 lease?

The 69.176.180.0 network has option 82 enabled, but the 69.176.179 network does
not. And looking how the option 82
info comes through this appears to be from the 69.176.180 network.

The "leased-address" log entry has me wondering. It didn't appear before
enabling option 82 as I went back in my logs
looking.

There is a leased address for both IP addresses in Dhcpd.leases.

As far as I can tell dhcp is working ok. Where is this log entry coming from and
is this something to be concerned about?

Thanks,
Keith