Remove the unspecified gateway from linux routing table

[Eugène Ngontang]

Hi guys,

Thanks for your answer. I'll check all the ways you recommended to me.

Regards,
Eugène NG

2015-02-17 22:13 GMT+01:00 Alex Bligh <alex at alex.org.uk>:

>
> On 17 Feb 2015, at 10:43, Eugène Ngontang <sympavali at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >     [root at hostname]# route -n
>
> Nothing to do with dhcpd, but in debugging weird Linux route config
> problems,
> I strongly recommend you to use the "ip route" command (rather than the
> "route" command) if your distro supports it. You get shown (and can
> manipulate)
> all sorts of stuff the legacy interface does not provide.
>
> Are you doing anything strange like pxebooting these hosts? If so, it's
> possible
> to gpxeboot to add the default route to the command line (check
>    cat /proc/cmdline
> to see if it's there), which some distros then stick in the routing table,
> in turn causing some DHCP issues.
>
> Further, I suggest you check the obvious (i.e. no other interface stanzas
> have
> a static default route with gateway 0.0.0.0), and that you aren't running
> dhcp
> on anything you don't mean to be running dhcp on (i.e. aren't getting dhcp
> from any other interfaces).
>
> --
> Alex Bligh
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>



-- 
ngonta_e at epitech.net
sympavali at gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------
*Aux hommes il faut un chef, et au*

* chef il faut des hommes!L'habit ne fait pas le moine, mais lorsqu'on te
voit on te juge!*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20150218/c7ef30aa/attachment.html>