DHCP Server IPv6 Option 64 AFTR_NAME

[Pietro Paolini]

Hello,

thank you a lot, the namespace solves the problem ! Thank you very much!



Pietro Paolini
pulsarpietro at aol.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Rudy Zijlstra <rudy at grumpydevil.homelinux.org>
To: dhcp-users <dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>
Sent: Wed, Oct 9, 2013 6:32 pm
Subject: Re: DHCP Server IPv6 Option 64 AFTR_NAME


Hi Pietro,option dhcp6.aftr code 64 = ip6-addressis the way i've solved 
that problem and tested that workingCheers,RudyOn 09-10-13 18:20, 
Michal Kostěnec wrote:> Hi Pietro,>> I tried configure your case in 
linux enviroment. I didn't get configured value in dhcp response, but 
when I use dhcp6. prefix (maybe namespace) before configured variable,  
i at least part of response (without value).>> option dhcp6.my-option 
code 64 = string; (maybe use ip6-address type of variable)>> subnet6 
2001:100::64 {> ...> option dhcp6.name-servers 2001:100::1;> option 
dhcp6.my-option aa:11:22:33;> }>> Maybe this is the way.>> Regards> 
Michal.>> On 9. 10. 2013, at 17:14, Pietro Paolini 
<pulsarpietro at aol.com> wrote:>>> Hello everyone,>> I am really 
struggling in order to make working my DHCP server with the option 64 - 
AFTR_NAME - required for the implementation of the DS-Lite network I am 
building right now.>>>> My dhcpd.conf is really simple and it includes 
this line:>>>> option my-option code 64 = string;>>>> subnet6 
2001:100::64 {>> ...>> option dhcp6.name-servers 2001:100::1;>> option 
my-option aa:11:22:33;>> }>>>> The problem is that the client - which 
requests the option 64 - does not receive it in the DHCP packet 
incoming (checked with Wireshark),  the option 23 (DNS) in indeed 
inside the packet but the 64 not. Surfing in internet I read this doc 
:>>>> 
http://www.ipamworldwide.com/dhcp-options/isc-dhcpv6-options.html>>>> 
Which lives empty the line for the ATFR_NAME then I was wondering ... 
is it possible to configure this option in the DHCP Server 4.1-ESV-R4 ? 
If not do you know a DHCP Server I can use in a Linux environment for 
that purpose ?>>>>>> Thanks  a lot from a exhausted guy :-)>>>> Pietro 
Paolini>> pulsarpietro at aol.com>>>> 
_______________________________________________>> dhcp-users mailing 
list>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>> 
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users> 
_______________________________________________> dhcp-users mailing 
list> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org> 
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users_______________________________________________dhcp-users 
mailing 
listdhcp-users at lists.isc.orghttps://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-u
sers