DHCP Wildcard issue

[jeffrey j donovan]

On Dec 10, 2013, at 12:19 PM, "Hauck, Jeffrey" <hauck at usgs.gov> wrote:

> Any ideas where the issue is?

your close;

> 
>  Serial Number 2001031201
> deny bootp;
> ddns-update-style none;
> option option-60 code 60 = string;
> option option-66 code 66 = string;
> option option-67 code 67 = string;
> option option-150 code 150 = string;
> 
> class "vdi" {
>    match if  substring (hardware, 1, 3) = 00:50:56;
>                  }
> 
>         subnet 10.1.49.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
> {
>         interface eth0;
>         authoritative;
> 
>         option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
>         option broadcast-address 10.1.49.255;
>         option routers 10.1.49.254;
>         option domain-name-servers 10.165.133.10, 10.1.192.1;   
>         option netbios-name-servers 10.165.133.10;
>         default-lease-time 4320;
>         max-lease-time 4320;
> 
>              pool {
>                allow members of "vdi";
>                range 10.1.49.110 10.1.49.210;
>                     }
> 
>             pool {
		  deny members of "vdi";
>                 range 10.1.49.1 10.1.49.100;
>                 allow unknown-clients;
>                    }
> }
> 

I am assuming you don't want vdi members to have and address from 1 to 100.

here is a nice reference http://www.ipamworldwide.com/declarations-topological/declarations-allowdenyignore.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20131210/f8c6b1f8/attachment-0001.html>