cannot change ip address in pool (fixed question)

Jan nowak docsis11 at gmail.com
Fri Sep 14 09:05:59 UTC 2012


I think I fixed the problem. I changed two variables:
default-lease-time 600; ( before 1200)
max-lease-time 3600; ( before 12000)

Is it good to have these values when i have more than 1k users ?


2012/9/13 Sten Carlsen <stenc at s-carlsen.dk>

>
> On 13/09/12 14:31, Glenn Satchell wrote:
>
> Actually defining pools at the shared-network level is ok, if somewhat
> unusual. The server will match the pool up with an appropriate subnet. So
> no need to re-write the config file.
>
>  Right, but then defining hosts at that level might get you in some
> "interesting" situations with inheritance of options from unexpected scopes.
>
> I think there might still be a good reason to go over the structure of the
> file and check it vs. best practices.
>
>  Now, as to what is going on, perhaps using grep to find entries in the log
> file for that mac address and ip address. With thousands of entries, the
> log file is going to be cluttered with other things.
>
> regards,
> -glenn
>
> On Thu, September 13, 2012 6:22 pm, Jan nowak wrote:
>
>  thanks for fast reply. You scared the hell out of me. I have 1k users in
> this config and every record have same pattern, all of this lines are in
> shared netowrk
>
> #######################################################################################
> host m69 { hardware ethernet 00:0a:73:f9:e6:3a; fixed-address
> 172.16.10.69;
> filename "file.cm";}
> class "M069" { match if binary-to-ascii(16, 8, ":", option
> agent.remote-id)
> = "0:a:73:f9:e6:3a"; spawn with option agent.remote-id; lease limit 1;}
> pool { allow members of "M069"; range 172.16.20.69; }
>
> host m70 { hardware ethernet 00:0a:73:f9:e6:31; fixed-address
> 172.16.10.70;
> filename "file.cm";}
> class "M070" { match if binary-to-ascii(16, 8, ":", option
> agent.remote-id)
> = "0:a:73:f9:e6:31"; spawn with option agent.remote-id; lease limit 1;}
> pool { allow members of "M070"; range 172.16.20.70; }
>
> host m71 { hardware ethernet 00:0a:73:f9:e6:32; fixed-address
> 172.16.10.71;
> filename "file.cm";}
> class "M071" { match if binary-to-ascii(16, 8, ":", option
> agent.remote-id)
> = "0:a:73:f9:e6:32"; spawn with option agent.remote-id; lease limit 1;}
> pool { allow members of "M071"; range 172.16.20.71; }
>
> host m72... etc
> ##########################################################################################
> and it would be very difficult to rewrite it. In this pattern every modem
> should have only one CPE device connected, so pool provides only one ip
> address. As you can see the class and poll fields aren't between host
> braces, they're independent of each other.
> So what should i do now, should i rewrite entire config file ?
>
> kind regards,
> Jan
>
> 2012/9/13 Simon Hobson <dhcp1 at thehobsons.co.uk> <dhcp1 at thehobsons.co.uk>
>
>  Jan nowak top-posted:
>
>
>  Sep 13 07:32:35 debian dhcpd: ICMP Echo reply while lease 172.16.20.203
>
>  valid.
> Sep 13 07:32:35 debian dhcpd: ICMP Echo reply while lease 172.16.20.203
> valid.
> Sep 13 07:32:35 debian dhcpd: ICMP Echo reply while lease 172.16.20.203
> valid.
> Sep 13 07:32:35 debian dhcpd: ICMP Echo reply while lease 172.16.20.203
> valid.
> Sep 13 07:32:37 debian dhcpd: Reclaiming abandoned lease 172.16.20.203.
> Sep 13 07:32:37 debian dhcpd: Reclaiming abandoned lease 172.16.20.203.
> Sep 13 07:32:37 debian dhcpd: Reclaiming abandoned lease 172.16.20.203.
> Sep 13 07:32:37 debian dhcpd: Reclaiming abandoned lease 172.16.20.203.
>
>
>  Not seen that first message before, but basically it means the server
> has
> pinged the address and got a reply - when it shouldn't have. So it's
> marked
> the lease as abandoned - abandoned leases are only used as last resort
> if
> nothing else is available.
>
> But this is a different address to the one of interest ...
>
>
>  Sep 13 07:32:41 debian dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration
>
>  directive: there is no lease associated with this client.
>
>
>  That would be correct - the lease has been abandoned and there's nothing
> leased to the client.
>
>
>  Sep 13 07:32:58 debian dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:14:5e:7f:35:3c via
>
>  eth0: network xxx: no free leases
>
>
>   Sep 13 07:32:58 debian dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:14:5e:7f:35:3c via
>
>  eth0: network xxx: no free leases
>
>
>  This is what you expect to see when using restricted lease ranges and
> old
> leases are still active. There isn't anything for the server to assign
> to
> the client. Again, this isn't the client (MAC) in the config snippet.
>
> It's not that helpful to see this unrelated log extract. If it's a
> network
> with too much DHCP traffic to extract only the relevant entries, then
> you
> probably need to either temporarily disable DHCP service for all but one
> client, or setup a test environment with only the one client.
>
>
>  shared-network xxx{
>
>  subnet 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 {
> next-server 192.168.0.1;
> option domain-name-servers 217.30.129.149, 217.30.137.200;
> option routers 172.16.0.1;
> option subnet-mask 255.255.0.0;
> option broadcast-address 172.16.255.255;
> }
>
>
>  Could I suggest better formatting would be a good idea ? Something like
> this would make the nesting more readily viewable :
>
>
> shared-network xxx{
>
>   subnet 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 {
>     next-server 192.168.0.1;
>     option domain-name-servers 217.30.129.149, 217.30.137.200;
>     option routers 172.16.0.1;
>     option subnet-mask 255.255.0.0;
>     option broadcast-address 172.16.255.255;
>   }
>
>   subnet ...
>
> This is especially true when we get to your host statements.
>
>
>  ##############################**###########
>
>  host m69 { hardware ethernet 00:0a:73:f9:e6:3a; fixed-address
> 172.16.10.69; filename "<http://plik.cm> <http://plik.cm>plik.cm";}
>
> class "M069" { match if binary-to-ascii(16, 8, ":", option
> agent.remote-id) = "0:a:73:f9:e6:3a"; spawn with option
> agent.remote-id;
> lease limit 1;}
> pool { allow members of "M069"; range 172.16.20.69; }
> ##############################**################
> }
>
>
>  Not only is this hard to read, it's mixing scopes as well.
>
>
> host m69 {
>   hardware ethernet 00:0a:73:f9:e6:3a;
>   fixed-address 172.16.10.69;
>   filename "plik.cm";}
>   class "M069" {
>     match if binary-to-ascii(16, 8, ":", option agent.remote-id) =
> "0:a:73:f9:e6:3a";
>     spawn with option agent.remote-id; lease limit 1;
>   }
>   pool {
>     allow members of "M069";
>     range 172.16.20.69;
>   }
> }
>
> So what *exactly* are you trying to achieve with this ?
> You've correctly put the host statement in the global scope, but then
> you've defined a class and pool within it.
> I'm not sure about the class (do these need to be in the global scope
> ?),
> but the pool really belongs within the subnet.
>
> And there should be no need to have both the class/pool AND a fixed
> address - either one or the other. So either :
>
>
> host m69 {
>   hardware ethernet 00:0a:73:f9:e6:3a;
>   fixed-address 172.16.10.69;
>   filename "plik.cm";}
> }
>
> or :
>
> class "M069" {
>
>   match if option agent.remote-id) = 0:a:73:f9:e6:3a;
>   spawn with option agent.remote-id; lease limit 1;
> }
> and
>
>   subnet 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 {
>     next-server 192.168.0.1;
>     option domain-name-servers 217.30.129.149, 217.30.137.200;
>     option routers 172.16.0.1;
>     option subnet-mask 255.255.0.0;
>     option broadcast-address 172.16.255.255;
>     pool {
>       allow members of "M069";
>       range 172.16.20.69;
>     }
>   }
>
> Ahh, now I've split that up, it becomes clearer. 172.16.10.69 is for the
> device with MAC address 00:0a:73:f9:e6:3a and 172.16.20.69 is for the
> downstream device.
> As you've defined it, I don't think the class would be matched because
> the
> definition (and pool statement) are within a host statement that will
> not
> apply to the downstream client.
> By definition, the downstream client will not be the host with MAC
> address
> 0:a:73:f9:e6:3a, so the host statement will not be matches, and nothing
> inside it will be acted upon.
>
> --
> Simon Hobson
>
> Visithttp://www.**magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/<http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/> <http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/>for
> books by acclaimed
> author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as
> Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> dhcp-users mailing listdhcp-users at lists.isc.orghttps://lists.isc.org/mailman/**listinfo/dhcp-users<https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users> <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing listdhcp-users at lists.isc.orghttps://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>
>  _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing listdhcp-users at lists.isc.orghttps://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>
>
> --
> Best regards
>
> Sten Carlsen
>
> No improvements come from shouting:
>        "MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20120914/ecd6b226/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the dhcp-users mailing list