DHCP server failover behind relay

[Vadym Abramchuk]

2012/9/6 Glenn Satchell <glenn.satchell at uniq.com.au>
>
> That's pretty dumb, but I guess you have to live with it. Saw the other
> reply - 40 subnets is too many to provision 40 relay systems, so scratch
> that idea.
>
> So that leaves the iptables -j TEE solution. That looks like it would be
> ok.
>  Not ideal, but satisfactory.
>
> My guess is the next network equipment refresh won't include those Dell
> switches :)
>
>
Just tried -j TEE and got the local loop with two servers copying packets
to each other :(.
Any idea on how to avoid this? TTL check looks weird.

--
wbr,
Vadym Abramchuk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20120906/977a0761/attachment.html>