DHCPv6 and MAC Address inclusion

[John Hascall]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:28 PM, <scott_stone at trendmicro.com> wrote:

> I've done some reading on this - the intent here was for laptops/etc that
> have wired and wireless cards, to get the same IP regardless.  Makes sense
> if you
>

Even assuming this is how all people want to handle laptops is incorrect.


John






think of it that way but it destroys my datacenter use-case.  DHCPv6 was
> likely designed 15+ years ago like IPv6 was and by the time anyone got
> around to actually using IPv6 en masse (ie, 2011), it was long obsolete and
> hadn't had the updates/attention that IPv4/DHCPv4 got over the same time
> period.****
>
> ** **
>
> Still scares me that there is no "private nonroutable" block of IPv6
> space.  Someone screws up an ACL somewhere and bam, private/firewalled
> machines (DB hosts, etc) are now exposed to the internet.****
>
> ** **
>
> ====================****
>
> Scott Stone <scott_stone at trendmicro.com>****
>
> Manager, DCS-RD****
>
> Trend Micro, Inc. http://www.trendmicro.com****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* dhcp-users-bounces+scott_stone=trendmicro.com at lists.isc.org[mailto:
> dhcp-users-bounces+scott_stone=trendmicro.com at lists.isc.org] *On Behalf
> Of *perl-list
> *Sent:* Monday, January 23, 2012 1:21 PM
> *To:* Users of ISC DHCP
> *Subject:* Re: DHCPv6 and MAC Address inclusion****
>
> ** **
>
> Imagine that you would like to add these interfaces to separate classes
> and assign addresses based on their class assignment.  How could you do
> that with no way to differentiate the interfaces?****
>
> ** **
>
> Someone dropped the ball designing DHCPv6.  I understand we all hate
> DHCPv4 or something (I don't), but not all ideas from DHCPv4 were bad.****
>
> ** **
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"scott stone" <scott_stone at trendmicro.com>
> *To: *dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> *Sent: *Monday, January 23, 2012 4:00:24 PM
> *Subject: *RE: DHCPv6 and MAC Address inclusion
>
> in our case, different "wires" but with dhcp relaying it goes to the same
> DHCP server, and the same server DUID is sent out on all NICs.
>
> ====================
> Scott Stone <scott_stone at trendmicro.com>
> Manager, DCS-RD
> Trend Micro, Inc. http://www.trendmicro.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcp-users-bounces+scott_stone=trendmicro.com at lists.isc.org [mailto:
> dhcp-users-bounces+scott_stone=trendmicro.com at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
> Ted Lemon
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 12:54 PM
> To: Users of ISC DHCP
> Cc: dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: DHCPv6 and MAC Address inclusion
>
> Why would you attach more than one NIC to the same wire?
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
> TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
> The information contained in this email and any attachments is
> confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property
> protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized
> to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by
> reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail
> system.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users****
>
> ** **
>
> TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
> The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20120123/7acd3c43/attachment.html>