"Healthy" servers issuing leases for length of MCLT
David W. Hankins
dhankins at isc.org
Thu Sep 23 19:31:33 UTC 2010
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:32:28AM -0700, Matt Causey wrote:
> Hum. Well adding the min-lease-time parameter causes the desired behavior.
> My access points are getting 12-hour leases now - even though they are
> asking for 5 minute ones, and this does not appear to interfere with the
> MCLT-assigned 'initial lease' that is assigned to a device.
Yes, min/max lease time's don't impact MCLT limitations on lease time
negotiation.
> Are there any potential negative implications to enforcing a min-lease-time
> that's the same as the default lease time?
Not really. It's quite common to configure min/default/max to the
same value if you want a specific lease time for all clients. So it
only removes the ability for the client to negotiate a shorter lease
time.
--
David W. Hankins BIND 10 needs more DHCP voices.
Software Engineer There just aren't enough in our heads.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. http://bind10.isc.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20100923/18651e38/attachment.bin>
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list