DHCPRELEASE question

[Darren]

David,

It is indeed a host record with fixed-address statement.  So there is no lease to release from the DHCP server's perspective.  The client thinks there is, however, and seems to have no way to tell.  Is this a wise design choice?  I know it has been that way for a long time, but technically the address was "leased" from the client's perspective.

On Apr 15, 2010, at 18:29 , David W. Hankins wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:40:58PM -0400, Darren wrote:
>> The difference I see here is that the release ended up on server-1 instead of server-2.  It still wasn't "found", however.
>> 
>> Since the release does not "find" the lease, no event is generated which is causing some problems in some other areas.
>> 
>> Any idea what the deal is?  Is this fixed in the 4.x.x tree?
> 
> Is this a host record with a fixed-address statement?
> 
> Host records have no state, and therefore no events.
> 
> -- 
> David W. Hankins	BIND 10 needs more DHCP voices.
> Software Engineer		There just aren't enough in our heads.
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		http://bind10.isc.org/
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users