To add some filter rules in conf file

[Ashmath Khan]

>
>> It does match, i have tried this without multiple range statements. The
>> match is for this rule, but when I use multiple range statements, it uses
>> the third range statement from 3.
>>
>
> So the client matches "rule1", gets a lease from a pool where "rule1" is
> allowed. There's nothing wrong there.
>
> Unless I've missed something.

yes, but that class has 3 range statements as you suggested to have multiple
range statements. It picks the address from 3rd range statement. Why not
first ? when first is available. So multiple range statements doesn't work
correctly inside a pool declaration. Hope this clarifies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20091102/3333e017/attachment.html>