DHCPv6 failover protocol?

[Ted Lemon]

On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:28 PM, David W. Hankins wrote:
> It's also quite possible we will have something very different; a
> stateless server algorithm so that (n+1) servers can answer
> consistently without needing to update each other.

You mean DHCPv6 load balancing?   Yes, that seems more likely.    
Because IPv6 has address deprecation, the need for failover is  
unlikely to ever justify the work involved in implementing it.