ISC DHCPv6 Server and Stateful Address Allocation
Greg.Rabil at ins.com
Greg.Rabil at ins.com
Mon Jan 5 22:00:06 UTC 2009
No, the "range" 2001:558:ff10:870:8000::/65 encompasses the addresses:
2001:558:ff10:870:8000:0000:0000:0000 - 2001:558:ff10:870:8FFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF
Which does _not_ include 2001:558:ff10:870:f914:a7c1:42d1:faa1
Regards,
Greg Rabil
-----Original Message-----
From: dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org [mailto:dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Hutzelman
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 4:50 PM
To: Users of ISC DHCP
Cc: Users of ISC DHCP
Subject: Re: ISC DHCPv6 Server and Stateful Address Allocation
--On Monday, January 05, 2009 01:43:59 PM -0500 John Jason Brzozowski
<jjmbcom at gmail.com> wrote:
> Given the above I would assume that any address allocated from the
> range6 2001:558:ff10:870:8000::/65 would have the 65 bit set leaving the
> remaining 63 bits to be populated dynamically by the server. This is now
> what I am observing however. Instead I see the following:
This address:
> RCV: | | X-- IAADDR 2001:558:ff10:870:f914:a7c1:42d1:faa1
Certainly lies within this range:
> range6 2001:558:ff10:870:8000::/65;
Where is the problem?
_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list