dhcpd upgrade 3.0.6 -> 3.1.2p1
Darren
perl-list at network1.net
Wed Aug 26 15:17:11 UTC 2009
Indeed they were. Any other thoughts?
On Aug 26, 2009, at 10:25 , Berg, M. van den wrote:
>
> Thought: Both servers should run the same version dhcpd
>
> --
> Meindert van den Berg
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org
>> [mailto:dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Darren
>> Sent: woensdag 26 augustus 2009 16:11
>> To: Users of ISC DHCP
>> Subject: dhcpd upgrade 3.0.6 -> 3.1.2p1
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Does anyone know if there are problems upgrading from 3.0.6 ->
>> 3.1.2p1
>> with the lease file format or perhaps failover issues in regards to
>> existing leases? I was experiencing very strange behavior with the
>> servers such as only 50% of the leases would be handed out. Both
>> servers were saying "peer holds all free leases" for the remaining
>> 50%. I even tried nuking the lease file from the secondary. The
>> secondary was recovering and the primary automatically entered
>> partner-
>> down. Both servers were STILL saying "peer holds all free
>> leases". I
>> have since reverted to 3.0.6. Thoughts?
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcp-users mailing list
>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************************************************
> The NLR disclaimer (http://www.nlr.nl/emaildisclaimer) is valid for
> NLR e-mail messages.
> *******************************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list