vendor-encapsulated-options and Scope

David W. Hankins David_Hankins at isc.org
Thu Dec 11 17:59:34 UTC 2008


On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:49:56AM -0600, Martin McCormick wrote:
> 	Any idea how the vendor-encapsulated-options in one
> network could poison DHCP for many other subnets?
> 
> subnet 10.193.228.0 netmask 255.255.252.0 {
> class "Cisco AP c1200" {

'class' statements are searched globally, even though they can be'
defined in any scope.

-- 
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil?	 https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		     you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		-- Jack T. Hankins
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20081211/50c0fb2e/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the dhcp-users mailing list