Best practice for defining static IP addresses?
andres wil
wcastro09 at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 13 13:33:20 UTC 2008
Hi
Does Any body knows why this secuense sometimes doesn´t work
service dhcpd restart, usually It says failed
but if you put /etc/init.d/dhcpd start, it works fine
I, am Confused
I appreciate any comment
--- On Wed, 8/6/08, Ryan McCain <Ryan.McCain at dss.state.la.us> wrote:
From: Ryan McCain <Ryan.McCain at dss.state.la.us>
Subject: RE: Best practice for defining static IP addresses?
To: dhcp-users at isc.org
Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 2:08 PM
Todd,
Thanks for the link.
>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:45 AM, in message
<1D8C9A4471119A40BD574F9D8D464AE301B85A76 at XCH60YKF.rim.net>, "Todd
Snyder"
<tsnyder at rim.com> wrote:
> http://marc.info/?l=dhcp-users&m=121088413725977&w=2 Covers it I
think
>
> Cheers,
>
> Todd.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org] On
> Behalf Of Ryan McCain
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:24 AM
> To: dhcp-users at isc.org
> Subject: RE: Best practice for defining static IP addresses?
>
> Todd,
>
> Thanks for the info. Do you have a link to your thread?
>
>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:02 PM, in message
> <1D8C9A4471119A40BD574F9D8D464AE301B85A6C at XCH60YKF.rim.net>,
"Todd
> Snyder"
> <tsnyder at rim.com> wrote:
>> I thought this very same thing until a few months ago, and after
>> bashing my head about for a while, I came here and was corrected.
>>
>> Static assignments need to be outside any defined ranges. This is
>> different than Windows DHCP, which lets you 'reserve' an ip in
the
>> middle of range.
>>
>> If you want to do the first option, you will have to define 2 ranges
>>
>> range 10.119.14.1 10.119.14.99
>>
>> and
>>
>> range 10.119.14.101 10.199.14.179
>>
>> Which isn't ideal.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Todd.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org] On
>> Behalf Of Ryan McCain
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 4:55 PM
>> To: dhcp-users at isc.org
>> Subject: Best practice for defining static IP addresses?
>>
>> Lets assume this is my DHCP scope:
>>
>> subnet 10.119.14.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>> range 10.119.14.1 10.119.14.179 ;
>> option routers 10.119.14.254 ;
>>
>> If I wanted to assign a static IP address, would I do?
>>
>> host Black {
>> hardware ethernet 00:19:5B:EC:A7:11;
>> fixed-address 10.119.14.100;
>> }
>>
>> or
>>
>> host Heart {
>> hardware ethernet 00:19:5B:EC:A7:12;
>> fixed-address 10.119.14.200;
>> }
>>
>> ..Notice that 'Black' is within the defined range while
'Heart' is
> not.
>>
>> I've always assume I could assign a static IP within the defined
range
>
>> and the MAC address would act as a 'key' to prevent it from
being
>> handed out (even though it's in a defined range).
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification..
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
>
>> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
>> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
>> non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other
>> than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
>> transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and
>> delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination,
>> distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended
> recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
your
> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
unlawful.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20080813/2259ab47/attachment.html>
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list