How dhcpd chooses which server to send DDNS updates
Simon Hobson
dhcp1 at thehobsons.co.uk
Fri May 18 14:04:16 UTC 2007
At 08:23 -0500 18/5/07, John Hascall wrote:
> > How about a 3 line change to dhcpd.conf to define the name server for
>> the zone? This is based on the entry in the dhcpd.conf man page under
>> DYNAMIC DNS UPDATE SECURITY:
>>
>> zone example.iastate.edu. {
>> primary 172.10.10.1;
>> }
>>
>> The primary statement specifies the IP address of the name
>> server whose zone information is to be updated.
>
>Does this apply if you are not using key-signed updates?
>If so, perhaps the man page should indicate this.
>
>John
>PS, the code should still do it right, I'd need to add this
> '3 line change' for over 1500 zones at present and then,
> of course, I'd need to make sure I keep up with each new
> zone added by the dns guys.
FWIW I'm inclined to agree with you. It's not that common a setup,
but I'm not entirely sure what the purpose of the "must have an NS
record" check is - it suggests that the SOA record can't be trusted.
Whether the SOA record is correct or not is of course up to the DNS
admins for the zone - if they can't get that right then it's not
DHCPDs fault !
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list