Tool for monitoring pool utilization?

[Gregory D Duhon]

This is the one I use.

http://www.omar.org/opensource/reportdhcp/

Greg
---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:50:08 -0700
>From: Chris De Young <chd at chud.net>  
>Subject: Re: Tool for monitoring pool utilization?  
>To: dhcp-users at isc.org
>
>Just what I was looking for - thanks!!
>-Chris
>
>Glenn Satchell wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>> 
>> I use this too, nice simple tool that does the job.
>> 
>> regards,
>> -glenn
>> --
>> Glenn Satchell     mailto:glenn.satchell at uniq.com.au | Some days we are
>> Uniq Advances Pty Ltd         http://www.uniq.com.au | the flies;  some
>> PO Box 70 Paddington NSW Australia 2021              | days we  are the
>> tel:0409-458-580  tel:02-9380-6360  fax:02-9380-6416 | windscreens...
>> 
>>> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:10:22 +0530
>>> From: cisco <isp.cisco at gmail.com>
>>> To: dhcp-users at isc.org
>>> Subject: Re: Tool for monitoring pool utilization?
>>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>> Yes,
>>>
>>> Try this..http://dhcpstatus.sourceforge.net/install.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Nirvana
>>>
>>> www.linux-gujarat.co.in : Learn Linux different Way  !!!
>>> www.linux-directory.net  : It's all Open Source & Linux ..
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/27/06, Chris De Young <chd at chud.net> wrote:
>>>> I'm sure this has been asked before, so I apologize if it is a FAQ,
>>>> though I didn't find anything in the archives.
>>>> Does anyone have or know of a good tool for monitoring pool
>>>> utilization?  I'm thinking of something where, say, I have a
>>>> configuration like this:
>>>>
>>>> shared-network foo {
>>>> .
>>>> .
>>>> .
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> shared-network piffle {
>>>> .
>>>> .
>>>> .
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Something which could give me a report along the lines of:
>>>>
>>>> Pool            Leases          In use          Abandoned
>>>> ----            ------          ------          ---------
>>>> foo             64              44              2
>>>> piffle          20              19              1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Free" instead of "in use" would be fine, but you get the idea. I
>>>> thought I'd see if anyone has already written something like this
>>>> before reinventing the wheel...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> -Chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>