Relay agents, NAT, and offers to giaddr

[David W. Hankins]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:59:34PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>   Note absense of SHOULD/MUST language, although it is there for the DHCPNAK.
> (section 3.2, page 18, second paragraph).

RFC2131 is an unfortunate document in many places such as this.

But I think in this case it is universally regarded as a MUST.

I note that a clarification is not present in Barr Hibbs and Rob
Stephens' document:

  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-implementation-02.txt

There probably should be one.

-- 
ISC Training!  October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area,
covering topics from DNS to DHCP.  Email training at isc.org.
-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.	-- Jack T. Hankins