It has been about six months since I got together with four of my friends from the DNS world and we co-authored a white paper which explains the technical problems with mandated DNS filtering. The legislation we were responding to was S. 968, also called the PROTECT-IP act, which was introduced this year in the U. S. Senate. By all accounts we can expect a similar U. S. House of Representatives bill soon, so we’ve written a letter to both the House and Senate, renewing and updating our concerns.
Please note that my co-authors and I are all strong advocates for individual property rights and for that matter we’re all copyright owners ourselves. We don’t think that “content wants to be free”. The parts of the proposed legislation that target online advertising and payment networks are solid work and will have a positive impact. But the part describing how ISP’s would filter their DNS results according to lists of bad domains maintained by the U. S. Gov’t is a bad idea — it won’t have much of an effect on counterfeiting or infringement online but it would surely create a lot of new problems — especially with DNSSEC.
I am especially concerned about the growing number of off-shore DNS services promising free, clean, unfiltered results. The letter attached below references three such services and our white paper from May 2011 predicted this exact outcome. I think it’s now obvious to everybody that there will be dozens or hundreds of “pirate-friendly DNS” services if S. 968 or anything like it becomes law. This would multiply the online perils faced by Internet end users in the United States, as well as mooting the new law.
Let’s stop online infringement and counterfeiting, but let’s do it sensibly — in a way that works and which won’t create new and worse problems.