cTLD and DNS upgrade
Brad Knowles
brad at stop.mail-abuse.org
Wed Jul 6 00:53:11 UTC 2005
At 2:34 AM +0200 2005-07-06, Brad Knowles wrote:
> Heck, this isn't a
> description of any sort of test to prove that you found a solution
> that works on anything more than the accidental types of cache
> pollution that you encountered.
Actually, all that Peter can really say is that he thinks he
found a solution that usually works against the specific example of
cache pollution/incorrect delegation data that he encountered at that
time.
> It's a perfectly valid character as part of a domain name. Try
> reading the RFCs. Labels in domain names are explicitly allowed to
> be 8-bit binary data, although there are strong recommendations to
> limit them to the standard syntax for host naming conventions (e.g.,
> RFC 1025 section 2.3.1, although I'm sure that this has been updated
> or perhaps even obsoleted by later RFCs).
Sorry, make that RFC 1035, not 1025. My bad.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list