preventing "update denied" (was 9.3.1 logging)
Doug Barton
dougb at dougbarton.us
Tue Dec 13 00:22:33 UTC 2005
Danny Thomas wrote:
> I remeber several people recommending a similar approach in the years
> since AD was released. Often the suggestion has been to use a name
> resolving to localhost or some unreachable address, or even a host
> that won't run a name-server, but we think it slightly cleaner having
> the mname simply not resolving to an A/AAAA record.
That's an interesting idea, but I am wondering what kind of testing you've
done, particularly with various vintages of windows clients, and what the
differences are between the two approaches from the client behavior standpoint.
Doug
--
If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough
More information about the bind-users
mailing list