Secondary server on primary
Joseph S D Yao
jsdy at cospo.osis.gov
Thu May 18 17:12:07 UTC 2000
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 12:03:28PM -0400, Jason McMullen wrote:
> Here's something thats got me thinking. On our primary namserver, have
> another domain setup as a secondary in our named.boot file. Does bind
> actually write a copy of their zone file somewhere? We listed in the
> named.boot file that it would be something like this:
>
> secondary domain.com 0.0.0.0 secondary/db.domain.com
>
> Now it *should* write a copy of their db file in the /etc/namedb/secondary
> directory, but it is not. Any suggestions?
I remember noticing the same thing once, but I'm not sure how I fixed
it. Is the master listing the slave as a name server? Can you resolve
info from domain.com on the slave server? Is the "secondary" directory
writable by the userid under which 'named' is running? Is it spelled
correctly??? ;-)
--
Joe Yao jsdy at cospo.osis.gov - Joseph S. D. Yao
COSPO/OSIS Computer Support EMT-B
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is not an official statement of COSPO policies.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list