BIND-Users mailing list

Experienced BIND users offer their support and advice on the user mailing list. To post on the BIND Users mailing list, you must subscribe.

Anyone can browse the list archives without subscribing.  We have three archive options:

Mailman archive

Mailarchive.com archive

Read in the Nabble forum


Current discussion on the BIND Users mailing list

>> I don't suppose there exists a configuration option in BIND which >> corresponds to Unbound's so-rcvbuf: and so-sndbuf: configuration >> options? > > There is only `./configure --with-tuning=large` which enables > more sockets and bigger socket buffers. Hmm, I already have that, but I wonder, how big is "bigger"? Well, looks like the answer is [...]
Tue, Dec 11, 2018, Continue reading at the source
Havard Eidnes wrote: > > I don't suppose there exists a configuration option in BIND which > corresponds to Unbound's so-rcvbuf: and so-sndbuf: configuration > options? There is only `./configure --with-tuning=large` which enables more sockets and bigger socket buffers. (I thought I also needed to set some sysctls too, so that BIND's request for bigger buffers [...]
Mon, Dec 10, 2018, Continue reading at the source
Hi, I don't suppose there exists a configuration option in BIND which corresponds to Unbound's so-rcvbuf: and so-sndbuf: configuration options? It would be useful to have those available to adjust only the "server sockets" BIND handle, instead of having to apply the corresponding settings system-wide, causing any new UDP sockets (including the many more temporary sockets BIND [...]
Mon, Dec 10, 2018, Continue reading at the source

Last modified: January 25, 2018 at 10:18 am