How should I configure internal and external DNS servers

Michael Richardson mcr at sandelman.ca
Sun Nov 5 10:30:27 UTC 2023


Greg Choules via bind-users <bind-users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
    > What would be better (IMHO) is for you to keep "example.com" as your
    > external zone in an external (hopefully in a DMZ) primary server,
    > serving the world with public addresses they need to reach, and
    > internally create a new zone - "internal.example.com" (maybe also other
    > "somethingX.example.com" too) as your internal zone in an internal
    > primary server for serving internal clients with the addresses they
    > need.

Would anyone be interested in formulating this into an IETF BCP RFC?
Or maybe a RIPE BCOP.
Your write up is excellent.  Worth keeping it somewhere.

    > The reason for the delegation is DNSSEC. If you enable DNSSEC

Yes.

    > That was a bit of an essay, but I hope at least some of it made sense.

:-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 658 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20231105/28d29b0c/attachment.sig>


More information about the bind-users mailing list