dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33

[Ondřej Surý]

Or cache snooping behaves differently between two (or multiple) queries.

That’s why questions like this should not imply where the problem is but rather describe what can be seen (possibly also on the wire).

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)

My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.

> On 26. 10. 2022, at 21:25, Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users <bind-users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> The change is that with 9.16, if the requested name is a CNAME, only the
>> CNAME value is returned by dig, while with 9.11 dig would return both the CNAME
>> value and the IP of the CNAME.
> 
> as others have said, this needs more details, but I wonder whether you might
> now be querying a server which has `minimal-responses yes' configured which it
> didn't previously.
> 
>    -JP
> 
> -- 
> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
> 
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users