CH/TXT/VERSION.SERVER queries

[Ondřej Surý]

Hi Anand,

correct me if I am wrong, but the VERSION.SERVER doesn't seem to be anywhere
documented[1], and you are the first one to request it[2].


1. RFC 4892 only talks about ID.SERVER
2. Please create a GitLab issue for tracking

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ondrej at isc.org

My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.



> On 14. 11. 2022, at 17:33, Anand Buddhdev <anandb at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks (especially BIND developers),
> 
> Apologies if this has been discussed and answered before. I just noticed that BIND doesn't respond to CH/TXT/VERSION.SERVER queries. It only responds to ID.SERVER.
> 
> Other name servers, such as Knot DNS, NSD, Verisign's ATLAS name server, Quad9's and Cloudflare's public resolvers, respond to VERSION.SERVER queries.
> 
> So what's the reason for BIND not responding to VERSION.SERVER queries? It seems like an anomaly or oversight.
> 
> Regards,
> Anand
> -- 
> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
> 
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20221114/576f8bb1/attachment.htm>