Confused by parental-source documentation
Matthijs Mekking
matthijs at isc.org
Fri May 6 12:48:02 UTC 2022
Hi Nick,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Yes, this is a copy paste
error. I think it can be removed, although we could change it because
you should make sure the address matches with what the parental agent
expects.
Best regards,
Matthijs
On 01-05-2022 07:18, Nick Tait via bind-users wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> I've been reading the latest BIND9 documentation on the new DNSSEC
> features, and section 4.2.28.1 got me horribly confused:
>
> /The following options apply to DS queries sent to
> //|parental-agents|//:/
>
> /|parental-source|/
>
> /|parental-source|//determines which local source address, and
> optionally UDP port, is used to send parental DS queries. This
> address must appear in the secondary server’s
> //|parental-agents|//zone clause. This statement sets the
> //|parental-source|//for all zones, but can be overridden on a
> per-zone or per-view basis by including a
> //|parental-source|//statement within the //|zone|//or
> //|view|//block in the configuration file./
>
> No matter how many times I read the sentence in blue font, I couldn't
> make sense of it...
>
> I finally realised that the parental-source paragraph is almost
> identical to the documentation for notify-source:
>
> /|notify-source|/
>
> /|notify-source|//determines which local source address, and
> optionally UDP port, is used to send NOTIFY messages. This
> address must appear in the secondary server’s
> //|primaries|//zone clause or in an //|allow-notify|//clause.
> This statement sets the //|notify-source|//for all zones, but
> can be overridden on a per-zone or per-view basis by including a
> //|notify-source|//statement within the //|zone|//or
> //|view|//block in the configuration file./
>
> And so I can only assume that the problematic sentence in
> parental-source (i.e. "/This address must appear in the secondary
> server’s //|parental-agents|//zone clause./") is a copy-paste error? If
> that is the case can the sentence please be removed from the documentation?
>
> Or if I'm mistaken can anybody please give an example to explain what
> this is trying to say?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick.
>
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list