bind 9.16.21 resolver performance degradation in my environment

이희영(접속제어팀) heeyoung90.lee at kt.com
Mon Nov 29 16:32:27 UTC 2021



Hello, I am running a resolver server using bind. I am currently using bind 9.11, and I am going to update it to 9.16. However, compared to 9.11, 9.16 is only half the performance. I'm asking for a solution to anyone who has experienced the same problem as me. And I have 20 threads, but only use 1 of them. I also tried the named option -n , but it didn't give me any better performance.

Performance measurement command: resperf -d normal_20210906.txt -s 59.18.54.71 -i 1 -L 2 ?P test.gnuplot -e -r 60

bind 9.11 performance: 97333 qps

bind 9.16 performance: 39100 qps

How can I solve this?

[Test environment]

  *   Equipment: Dell R640 (CPU Intel Xeon Gold 5215 cpu @ 2.50GHz, 10core)
  *   OS : Centos Linux release 7.9
  *   BIND version: 9.16.21
  *   LIBRARY : libuv-1.35.0 / openssl-1.0.2k-16/ glibc-2.17-260
  *   build option : starting BIND 9.16.21 (Extended Support Version) id:a8aa450 running on Linux x86_64 3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 8 23:39:32 UTC 2018 built with '--prefix=/usr/local' '--sysconfdir=/usr/local/etc' '--localstatedir=/var/named' '--disable-auto-validation' running as: named -u named compiled by GCC 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-36) compiled with OpenSSL version: OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017 linked to OpenSSL version: OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017 compiled with zlib version: 1.2.7 linked to zlib version: 1.2.7

[cid:image002.png at 01D7E58A.209E1EC0]

[Network diagram]

Bind 9.16.21
Bind 9.11.31
[cid:image004.jpg at 01D7E58A.209E1EC0]

[cid:image005.jpg at 01D7E58A.209E1EC0]
[cid:image006.jpg at 01D7E58A.209E1EC0]

[cid:image007.jpg at 01D7E58A.209E1EC0]



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20211129/94cc12da/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 33297 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20211129/94cc12da/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 53732 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20211129/94cc12da/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 9301 bytes
Desc: image005.jpg
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20211129/94cc12da/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 55283 bytes
Desc: image006.jpg
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20211129/94cc12da/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 9567 bytes
Desc: image007.jpg
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20211129/94cc12da/attachment-0007.jpg>


More information about the bind-users mailing list