AW: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

[Klaus Darilion]

Do you think that we can get rid of CNAME too? 

regards
Klaus

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Ondřej Surý <ondrej at isc.org>
> Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 19:19
> An: Klaus Darilion <klaus.darilion at nic.at>
> Cc: Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org>; bind-users at lists.isc.org
> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR
> 
> No, and there’s no strong usercase for that. The ANAME was wrong on every
> level from the protocol perspective and I am glad it is gone.
> 
> Ondřej
> --
> Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
> 
> My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not
> feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
> 
> > On 9. 8. 2021, at 17:23, Klaus Darilion via bind-users <bind-
> users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
> >
> > Does every application that uses gethostbyname have a benefit of
> HTTPS/SVCB? That is what I meant.
> > regards
> > Klaus
> >
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org>
> >> Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 15:55
> >> An: Klaus Darilion <klaus.darilion at nic.at>
> >> Cc: Evan Hunt <each at isc.org>; Gaurav Kansal <gaurav.kansal at nic.in>;
> bind-
> >> users at lists.isc.org
> >> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR
> >>
> >> Every resolver on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB.  Every
> >> authoritative server on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB via
> >> unknown record format. iOS is already making HTTPS queries for every
> >> webpage. I believe other browsers also make HTTPS queries today. Go
> look
> >> at your DNS traffic.
> >>
> >> The MR mentioned earlier allows named and the other tools to load and
> >> display the records in presentation format and to do the additional
> section
> >> processing.  None of that it required to be able to return these records.   It
> >> just makes it easier.
> >>
> >> Just about all the other DNS vendors also have code that can read and
> >> display presentation format.
> >>
> >> ANAME is dead.
> >> --
> >> Mark Andrews
> >>
> >>> On 9 Aug 2021, at 21:53, Klaus Darilion via bind-users <bind-
> >> users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>>> Von: bind-users <bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org> Im Auftrag von
> Evan
> >>>> Hunt
> >>>> Gesendet: Samstag, 7. August 2021 20:21
> >>>> An: Gaurav Kansal <gaurav.kansal at nic.in>
> >>>> Cc: bind-users at lists.isc.org
> >>>> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR
> >>>>
> >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 11:05:51PM +0530, Gaurav Kansal wrote:
> >>>>>> I need the help in figuring out whether BIND supports ANAME ? If
> yes,
> >>>>>> then from which version on wards ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No, it doesn't. The effort to standardize ANAME stalled, and I doubt
> >>>>> it'll be coming back.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The new HTTPS and SVCB records look like a better approach anyway.
> >>>>> BIND will have support for those pretty soon.
> >>>
> >>> But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years
> until
> >> all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be
> >> implemented in the authoritative name server and hence would work for
> >> every client/resolver as client/resolver never sees the ANAME but only the
> >> A/AAAA record.
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>> Klaus
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe
> >> from this list
> >>>
> >>> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> >> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> >> information.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> bind-users mailing list
> >>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> >>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
> from this list
> >
> > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> information.
> >
> >
> > bind-users mailing list
> > bind-users at lists.isc.org
> > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users