AW: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

[Klaus Darilion]

Does every application that uses gethostbyname have a benefit of HTTPS/SVCB? That is what I meant.
regards
Klaus

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org>
> Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 15:55
> An: Klaus Darilion <klaus.darilion at nic.at>
> Cc: Evan Hunt <each at isc.org>; Gaurav Kansal <gaurav.kansal at nic.in>; bind-
> users at lists.isc.org
> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR
> 
> Every resolver on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB.  Every
> authoritative server on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB via
> unknown record format. iOS is already making HTTPS queries for every
> webpage. I believe other browsers also make HTTPS queries today. Go look
> at your DNS traffic.
> 
> The MR mentioned earlier allows named and the other tools to load and
> display the records in presentation format and to do the additional section
> processing.  None of that it required to be able to return these records.   It
> just makes it easier.
> 
> Just about all the other DNS vendors also have code that can read and
> display presentation format.
> 
> ANAME is dead.
> --
> Mark Andrews
> 
> > On 9 Aug 2021, at 21:53, Klaus Darilion via bind-users <bind-
> users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
> >
> > 
> >>
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: bind-users <bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org> Im Auftrag von Evan
> >> Hunt
> >> Gesendet: Samstag, 7. August 2021 20:21
> >> An: Gaurav Kansal <gaurav.kansal at nic.in>
> >> Cc: bind-users at lists.isc.org
> >> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR
> >>
> >>> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 11:05:51PM +0530, Gaurav Kansal wrote:
> >>> I need the help in figuring out whether BIND supports ANAME ? If yes,
> >>> then from which version on wards ?
> >>
> >> No, it doesn't. The effort to standardize ANAME stalled, and I doubt
> >> it'll be coming back.
> >>
> >> The new HTTPS and SVCB records look like a better approach anyway.
> >> BIND will have support for those pretty soon.
> >
> > But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years until
> all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be
> implemented in the authoritative name server and hence would work for
> every client/resolver as client/resolver never sees the ANAME but only the
> A/AAAA record.
> >
> > regards
> > Klaus
> > _______________________________________________
> > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
> from this list
> >
> > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> information.
> >
> >
> > bind-users mailing list
> > bind-users at lists.isc.org
> > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users