recursive resolver
G.W. Haywood
bind at jubileegroup.co.uk
Sat Mar 14 13:30:59 UTC 2020
Hi there,
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2020, ShubhamGoyal wrote:
>
>> How can i improve my recursive resolver speed.
>
> I wonder if you have some kind of networking misconfiguration which
> results in timeouts while BIND is waiting for responses. Perhaps you
> will learn more about what is happening if you look at the network
> traffic using a tool such as Wireshark.
------------------------------
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020, Grant Taylor wrote:
> I feel like running a network sniffer (tcpdump, Wireshark, etc.) on the
> recursive resolver will make it quite apparent ...
Great minds think alike... :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For the purposes of comparison you can always try a public service:
laptop3:~$ >>> dig @8.8.8.8 lists.isc.org
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Debian <<>> @8.8.8.8 lists.isc.org
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 24936
;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;lists.isc.org. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
lists.isc.org. 7199 IN A 149.20.1.60
;; Query time: 62 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Sat Mar 14 13:15:51 GMT 2020
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 58
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems to me that 62ms is very respectable. If you have problems with
your own service you can probably use a different one, if only until
such time as you can fix your own (and if indeed it needs to be fixed).
--
73,
Ged.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list