Allow only temporary zone updates without making them permanent

[Lefteris Tsintjelis]

On 26/6/2019 22:56, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
> On 6/26/19 1:17 PM, Lefteris Tsintjelis via bind-users wrote:
>> If I set it though, and named no longer has access to modify and
>> rewrite other files but its own, will it break things? What will
>> happen in case of a dynamic update like ACME in this case? Will the
>> update go through?
> 
> I think that would be HIGHLY dependent on /how/ named updates files.
> 
> Does it try to move (rename) existing files and create /new/ files?  Or
> does it rewrite contents of /exiting/ files.
> 
> I don't know these particulars.  I've never had a problem allowing named
> to have write access to the directory and do what it wants with the
> files therein.

Just to satisfy my curiosity, I will have to do more experimenting but I
believe the best way to deal with this and to avoid possible trouble is
to create an independent zone, just as Tony previously described.

Thank you all

Lefteris