SSHFP observation

[Alan Clegg]

On 1/31/19 1:12 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

> On 31.01.19 12:33, Alan Clegg wrote:
>> These are not valid SSH Fingerprints.
>>
>> Garbage in, garbage out.
>>
>> I see no bug.
> 
> well, either BIND should reject those records as invalid and not to send
> them, or dig (from bind package) should not complain about malformed
> responses.

Ok, fair point.  I'll bring it up with the BIND team.

If I don't return in 2 weeks, send in a search party.

AlanC