Browne, Stuart via bind-users <bind-users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
> - { name: 'net.ipv4.tcp_sack', value: 0 }
Why? SACK is super important for TCP performance over links that have any
degree of lossiness, and I don't recall hearing of any caveats.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
a just distribution of the rewards of success