Suggestions for a distributed DNS zone hosting solution I'm designing

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

>Latitude <arlendelcastillo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I must deploy a DNS system with the following requirements:
>> - single master server, multiple slave servers
>> - minimal time for name resolving for Americas, Europe and Asia

On 08.03.18 12:52, Tony Finch wrote:
>Best way to achieve this is with anycast, which can be pretty
>time-consuming to set up - try searching for Nat Morris's presentation
>"anycast on a shoestring" which he gave at several NOG meetings.
>The advantage of anycast (as opposed to having NS records in lots of
>locations) is that you are depending less on resolvers to work out for
>themselves which of your servers is fastest.

I consider anycast a good solution when providing recursive DNS as an ISP.
I am not sure if it's good idea for authoritative servers, unless you of
course have your own routed IP range and of course multiple POPs over the
world.

...some registries require nameserver IPs in different IP ranges, so they could
refise register domains to your anycast servers.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod