SRV record not working
Grant Taylor
gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net
Sat Aug 18 17:42:20 UTC 2018
On 08/18/2018 07:25 AM, Bob McDonald wrote:
> I don't think anyone hates nslookup (well maybe a few do <grin>) I
> suppose the immense dislike stems from the fact that it's the default
> utility under Windows. Folks who use dig as their default realize that
> when used properly, dig provides much more functionality than nslookup.
> For example, try using TSIG with nslookup or getting a NSID response.
> These are only a couple of examples. There's other reasons to change.
> The output from dig is much more comprehensive. And, yes, if you install
> the bind tools from ISC under Windows, dig works quite well.
I've been told that nslookup will lie and provide incorrect information
in some situations. I have no idea what situations that is. I would
love to learn what they are.
If you know of such an example, please enlighten me.
As such, I tend to use nslookup on platforms without dig when or until I
have reason to not do so.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3982 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20180818/d403ce1c/attachment.bin>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list