BIND9 Feature Request: 'fowarders' priority & round-robin pools

[Darcy Kevin (FCA)]

I believe you could implement what you're looking for with a reasonably-sophisticated software/hardware load-balancer technology and/or some number of virtual machines, no BIND code changes required.

Personally, I don't like forwarding much at all -- I only use it where it's absolutely necessary, due to the presence of a multi-tiers-of-security network topology -- so this whole discussion pretty much falls into my "trying to teach a pig to sing" category. Feel free to ignore any or all of my comments in the thread.

																		- Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of nrgd at eml.cc
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 3:21 PM
To: bind-users at lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND9 Feature Request: 'fowarders' priority & round-robin pools

Somehow all that ^ puffery translates into NOT wanting to allow the user to prioritize the use of forwarders the way they want?

Um, ok ...


_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users