BIND9 Feature Request: 'fowarders' priority & round-robin pools

[nrgd at eml.cc]

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote:
> So, if your link is saturated to the point that you can't hold up a VPN connection reliably, you fall back to an less-secure method of resolution?

No.

> Non-deterministic security, what a concept!

Didn't take long for you to resort to childish snark to did it?

> Has it occurred to you, that you're giving the bad guys -- the ones that want to pry on your query data -- an incentive to also partially DoS your link, as a way to downgrade your query security?

No, because I prefer not to waste my time with hypothetical/idle speculation.

> -1 on this feature request.

I don't know who you are.  Is that an opinion, or a project decision?